ILLUSTRATIVE CASE STUDY · NOT AN ACTUAL CITY PROJECT OR FIRM QUOTE
South Florida Tennis Pros logoSOUTH FLORIDA
TENNIS PROS
A PRACTICAL EXAMPLE · MUNICIPAL PARKS & RECREATION

What could it take to
bring a park back to life?

From the first conversation to an operating community asset, explore a transparent, stage-by-stage hypothetical park project, with sample cost ranges, funding research and optional technology opportunities. Our approach starts with tennis but looks at the full park.

Roles stay separate: South Florida Tennis Pros is the tennis and community-facing business; Cedric Burl & Company is the consulting provider using its AGI Method™; and National Tennis Community Association is an independent nonprofit collaborator in qualified community-access initiatives. These entities do not hold a city contract in this illustration.
THE FICTIONAL PARK

Introducing Meadowview Community Park

Imagine a city-owned, roughly seven-acre neighborhood park with two worn tennis courts, a small multipurpose field, aging paths and lighting, and limited recreation programming.

Residents want safe, affordable spaces for tennis and other sports. The city wants a feasible plan that protects public access, can be funded responsibly and won't leave it with a maintenance obligation it cannot sustain.

7 acresIllustrative publicly owned site
2 courtsPlus field, paths and basic amenities
1 cityOwner, decision maker and procurement authority

Meadowview is a fabricated example, not an actual site or active City of Birmingham project. Conditions, procurement, access restrictions, environmental risk and technical scope would require site-specific verification.

FROM DISCOVERY TO ACTIVATION

What might each stage cost?

Select a redevelopment scope to see an illustrative planning model. These are invented order-of-magnitude planning allowances, not project bids, engineering estimates, CB&C fees, municipal appropriations or promises of services.

Community renewal

Two courts, multipurpose field and accessible paths refurbished, with practical community programming.
Illustrative project total incl. 15% contingency
$1,656,000
AGI / project stagePossible work and accountable specialistsSample allowance
01 · AssessCondition, access, users, community and stakeholder needs$15,000
02 · PlanDesign, engineer, estimate, and determine permits$85,000
03 · Fund & procureResource strategy, eligibility and procurement planning$25,000
04 · RedevelopAuthorized professional repairs/construction$1,250,000
05 · ActivateProgram start-up and training$65,000
Planning & capital subtotal$1,440,000
Illustrative contingency (15%)$216,000
Annual operations, not included above$75k–$160k
Costs are not quotes. A real city must determine project scope, soil/drainage condition, accessibility, construction materials, labor, public engagement, permitting, procurement, insurance, contingency and long-term maintenance. Actual costs may be far above or below these assumptions; the contingency is a modeling convenience, not a professionally set reserve. Any consulting, architecture, engineering, project management, capital work or construction requires a properly scoped agreement and qualified providers.
AGI FINANCIAL MODEL

Funding should follow the plan, not the other way around.

CB&C's AGI sequence is Assessment → Growth Strategy → Implementation. Once cost estimates and public eligibility are supported, funding research can evaluate options in a prioritized order.

  1. City-approved budget and existing resources
  2. Free technical assistance and relevant grant opportunities
  3. Philanthropy, eligible capital programs and compatible sponsorships
  4. Appropriately structured public or private financing if needed
  5. Long-term operating plan that preserves public access

Any grant or incentive must be checked for eligibility, matching obligations, application windows, restricted spending and city authority. A list of programs is not a funding commitment. Revenue from programming or sponsorship must comply with city rules and public-access goals.

OPTIONAL SPECIALIST WORKSTREAM

More value from permitted data and selective automation.

Technology comes after the city's needs, rights and operational capacity are understood. Nothing here assumes that the city owns commercially licensable data or that robots will work in an outdoor park.

01 · MAKE THE DATA USEFUL

Operational intelligence

Where authorized, examine reservation, asset-maintenance and work-order systems to understand peak facility use, downtime, maintenance backlogs and program demand.

  • Improve operating decisions first.
  • Confirm contractual data rights and permissions.
  • Use appropriate aggregation, controls and access limits.
02 · TEST THE TASK

Robotics feasibility

Evaluate repetitive, bounded tasks in a suitable indoor recreation building, such as routine floor care or internal supply transport, only if the facility and vendors confirm safety and operational fit.

  • Human supervision and incident procedures.
  • Vendor-defined demo, service and maintenance costs.
  • No procurement or deployment assumed.
03 · OPTIONAL / SEPARATE

Private business data licensing

A separately contracted private operator or eligible business may choose to have historical operational records screened by an independent specialist for potential AI-training data demand.

  • Two to three years of SaaS history alone is not eligibility.
  • Rights, consent, de-identification and actual buyer demand required.
  • Assumed revenue: $0 until a valid agreement exists.
Important municipal boundary: Public-agency, school, staff, youth, patron and personal records are not presumed available for commercial licensing. No city-owned records should be exported, offered or monetized without clear governmental authority, law/policy review and a lawful data-use agreement. Diffraction is a potential vendor under evaluation, not a confirmed SFTP, CB&C or municipal delivery partner. The city or business may choose analytics without licensing, and may reject both licensing and robotics.

For more information about possible private business-data use and licensing practices, see Diffraction's published guidance ↗. No licensing income, buyer or referral fee is guaranteed.

FIRST 90 DAYS

What a city would evaluate before approving implementation.

Days 1–30

Confirm the decision maker, site control, desired outcomes, existing plans, project records and available information. Identify procurement and consultation needs.

Days 31–60

With authorization, produce preliminary site and community opportunity assessments, feasibility questions, broad cost scenarios and potential resource categories.

Days 61–90

Present a decision roadmap, evidence gaps, recommended specialists, sourcing pathway and a city-approved next-phase scope, if any.

Is there a park your city wants to examine?

Start with a high-level discussion. CB&C can evaluate whether a formal AGI assessment or specialist-led feasibility study would be appropriate.

Explore a strategy discussion ↗

SFTP is a commercial tennis platform. CB&C offers consulting and coordination separately; NTCA is an independent nonprofit collaborator. Municipal procurement, licensing, data rules, grant conditions and conflicts-of-interest policies govern any potential engagement. Use our contact form to start a project discussion.